{"id":28181,"title":"Putting a Price on Carbon \u2013 5 Takeaways from our New Studies","link":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/de\/miscellaneous\/putting-a-price-on-carbon-5-takeaways-from-our-new-studies\/","date":"2. Juli 2021","date_unix":1625231171,"date_modified_unix":1747999636,"date_iso":"2021-07-02T13:06:11+00:00","content":"<p>We asked the Kiel Institute for the World Economy (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ifw-kiel.de\/\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"\u00d6ffnet in einem neuen Tab\" >Kiel Institute &#8211; Understanding and Shaping Globalization (ifw-kiel.de)<\/a>) to calculate the effects of different carbon pricing scenarios. Here is a summary of the results.<\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Bepreisung_2021_en_final.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"\u00d6ffnet in einem neuen Tab\" >Find our factsheet on the topic right here<\/a><\/h4>\n<h2><strong>Going it alone will get the EU only so far!<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>By setting ambitious climate goals, the European Union (EU) is sending an important signal in the fight against climate change. Yet according to a simulation done by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy on behalf of the Bertelsmann Stiftung, the higher carbon prices that would result would only reduce greenhouse gas emissions to a limited extent over the long term \u2013 namely by just 2.5 percent, if carbon prices in the EU rise by an additional $50. That would be the equivalent of 760 million tons of CO<sub>2<\/sub>.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-28195 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb15_en.jpg\" alt=\"carbon pricing\" width=\"2067\" height=\"672\" srcset=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb15_en.jpg 2067w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb15_en-300x98.jpg 300w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb15_en-1024x333.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb15_en-768x250.jpg 768w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb15_en-600x195.jpg 600w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb15_en-1536x499.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb15_en-2048x666.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 2067px) 100vw, 2067px\" \/><\/p>\n<h2><strong>2) Globalization matters for climate change policy!\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>The reasons for this modest outcome are Europe\u2019s small share of global emissions and the international division of labor. Higher carbon prices in Europe cause emissions to leak to countries where carbon prices are lower. In addition, European companies initially become less competitive. Countries with less efficient industries that are highly dependent on fossil fuels are particularly hard hit.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>3) A global climate club is effective and not too expensive!<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>Transregional (the EU together with the US and\/or China) or even global initiatives for carbon pricing (climate clubs) would have a much greater environmental impact compared to Europe\u2019s going it alone.<\/p>\n<p>A global increase in the carbon price of \u20ac50 would lead to a long-term reduction in global emissions of 38.6 percent, or 11.5 billion tons. Were the resulting tax revenues to be redistributed on a per capita basis, the income effects would be moderate: just 0.5 percent of GDP per country on average.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_28196\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-28196\" class=\"wp-caption alignnone\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-28196 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb10_en.jpg\" alt=\"carbon pricing\" width=\"1004\" height=\"1173\" srcset=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb10_en.jpg 1004w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb10_en-257x300.jpg 257w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb10_en-876x1024.jpg 876w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb10_en-768x897.jpg 768w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Abb10_en-600x701.jpg 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1004px) 100vw, 1004px\" \/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-28196\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">carbon pricing<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2><strong>4) An EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism helps to reduce carbon leakage but that\u2019s about it!<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>The carbon border adjustments planned by the EU would help reduce the shift in emissions to other countries, should Europe act on its own. The EU\u2019s<a href=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/sustainability\/what-can-we-do-about-carbon-leakage\/\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"\u00d6ffnet in einem neuen Tab\" > carbon leakage<\/a> rate <strong>\u2013 <\/strong>would diminish from 14.9 to 10.8 percent.<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, they would reduce the economic costs within Europe. Yet they would have very little impact on global CO<sub>2<\/sub> emissions: Instead of 2.5 percent, long-term emissions would be reduced by only 2.7 percent.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2><strong>5) Go for the club \u2013 but take into account the international division of labor and share the financial burdens!<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p><strong><br \/>\n<\/strong>In terms of implementing an effective global climate policy, the EU, as an open economy with a high volume of emissions, should focus more in the future on its consumption-based emissions (carbon footprint) rather than looking only at production-related (territorial) emissions.<\/p>\n<p>It should view carbon border adjustments as an interim response and redouble its efforts to find a solution involving a transregional or, over the long term, even a global climate club.<\/p>\n<p>In implementing this solution, it should also take into account the social and economic costs for lower-income households and developing countries.<\/p>\n<p><em>Stay tuned as we detail the results of our studies in the forthcoming blog posts.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Do you want to know more? Find our factsheet as a free PDF <a href=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/FS_CO2_Bepreisung_2021_en_final.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"\u00d6ffnet in einem neuen Tab\" >right here.<\/a><\/p>\n","excerpt":"<p>We asked the Kiel Institute for the World Economy (Kiel Institute &#8211; Understanding and Shaping Globalization (ifw-kiel.de)) to calculate the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","thumbnail":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/Bildschirmfoto-2021-07-02-um-14.37.03.png","thumbnailsquare":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2021\/07\/Bildschirmfoto-2021-07-02-um-14.37.03.png","authors":[{"id":312,"name":"Thie\u00df Petersen","link":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/blogger\/dr-thiess-petersen\/"},{"id":20300,"name":"Thomas Rausch","link":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/de\/blogger\/thomas-rausch\/"}],"categories":[{"id":168,"name":"Miscellaneous","link":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/category\/miscellaneous\/"}],"tags":[{"id":285,"name":"carbon","link":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/tag\/carbon\/"},{"id":282,"name":"carbon pricing","link":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/tag\/carbon-pricing\/"}]}