{"id":20654,"title":"Are the G7 Countries no Longer Germany&#8217;s Top Trading Partners ?","link":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/de\/economy-security-trade\/are-the-g7-countries-no-longer-germanys-top-trading-partners\/","date":"29. Oktober 2018","date_unix":1540846990,"date_modified_unix":1754485130,"date_iso":"2018-10-29T21:03:10+00:00","content":"<p><i>Today we are looking at Germany&#8217;s trade partners. In our mini-series on Global Value Chains (GVCs) we look at how three German key industries \u2013 motor vehicles, chemicals and machinery \u00a0&#8211; are part of complex international production networks. <\/i><i>Economist sometimes call this the \u2018second wave of global unbundling\u2019. In this series we analyze this fragmentation of production for three key German industries: <strong>machinery and equipment, chemicals, and motor vehicles<\/strong>.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>In the first part of this series we looked at how <a href=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/ged-blog\/improving-public-understanding-of-economic-globalisation\/german-key-industries-in-a-global-value-chains-network\/\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"\u00d6ffnet in einem neuen Tab\"  data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/ged-blog\/improving-public-understanding-of-economic-globalisation\/german-key-industries-in-a-global-value-chains-network\/\">Germany&#8217;s key industries are linked to the world.<\/a>\u00a0Today we discuss whether G7 countries still play an important role as\u00a0<strong><i>Germany&#8217;s trade partners<\/i><\/strong>, as their outstanding position has diminished with the increasing importance of the more diverse group of G20 countries.<br \/>\n<b><i><\/i><\/b><br \/>\nThe <strong>G7\u00a0<\/strong>was established in 1975 as an informal group of the (at the time) the most developed economies, i.e.<\/p>\n<p>Canada<\/p>\n<p>France<\/p>\n<p>Germany<\/p>\n<p>Italy<\/p>\n<p>Japan,<\/p>\n<p>the United Kingdom<\/p>\n<p>and the United States<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; well before the economic rise of China. Nevertheless, the G7 still hold an extraordinary position in the global economy and represents 46% of global nominal GDP.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>1. For Supply Chains &#8211; Not So Much Anymore<\/h2>\n<p>In 2000, G7 countries contributed more than 40% of the foreign value added within the supply chain. This share decreased by 2014 to about 30%. This decrease went hand-in-hand with a significant increase in value added from <strong>Eastern Europe <\/strong>and <strong>BRIC\u00a0<\/strong>countries which will be discussed in subsequent blogposts.<\/p>\n<p>These changes cannot be attributed to shifts in buying decisions by German actors alone. It rather reflects a general trend in global trade, where the suppliers of German industries face the same make-or-buy decisions and the same shifts in global supply as the German actors themselves. The \u2018foreign value added\u2019 in Figure 1 aggregates all value added by countries outside Germany with no distinction in the supply chain step or the respective processes it takes place in.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1.png\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"\u00d6ffnet in einem neuen Tab\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-20659\" src=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1.png\" alt=\"Foreign contribution 1\" width=\"1298\" height=\"898\" srcset=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1.png 1298w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1-300x208.png 300w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1-1024x708.png 1024w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1-768x531.png 768w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1-600x415.png 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1298px) 100vw, 1298px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>2. Germany&#8217;s trade partners: For Work-Intensive Processes \u2013 Decreased Importance<\/h2>\n<p>Production processes in the key industries did not change structurally, they mainly relocated. In total, the contribution of G7 countries to the foreign value added within the supply chain decreased from around 40% in 2000 to around 30% in 2014.<\/p>\n<p>Zooming into the <strong>supply chains <\/strong>and analyzing the different processes involved reveals that the relevance of the G7 is decreasing across all supplying processes, but that this decrease differs in magnitude. The G7 always played a more prominent role in some sectors than in others. The G7 share of value added in the \u2018raw materials\u2019 sector in 2000 was <strong>below 20%<\/strong>.\u00a0In contrast, the sectors \u2018<strong>research and development<\/strong>\u2019 and \u2018<strong>other services<\/strong>\u2019 were key sectors for the G7 countries in 2000 with a share of about 50% across the three industries analyzed.<\/p>\n<p>Looking at working hours within the foreign supply chain, the effect is even more drastic. By 2000, the G7 countries as Germany&#8217;s trade partners contributed only a little more than 10% of total working hours within the foreign supply chain across all three German key industries.<\/p>\n<p>The divergence of value added and working hours, which could be seen back in 2000, continued to grow in the following years. The role of the G7 for these supply chains has decreased particularly strongly for simple, work-intensive processes. (High-value services were outsourced to other countries to a lesser degree with a larger share remaining inside the G7 countries.)<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1-2.png\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"\u00d6ffnet in einem neuen Tab\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-20661\" src=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1-2.png\" alt=\"Foreign contribution 1-2\" width=\"1298\" height=\"898\" srcset=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1-2.png 1298w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1-2-300x208.png 300w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1-2-1024x708.png 1024w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1-2-768x531.png 768w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/Foreign-contribution-1-2-600x415.png 600w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1298px) 100vw, 1298px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>You may also enjoy reading our post on how <a href=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/allgemein-en\/how-germanys-weak-innovation-eco-system-is-driving-inequality\/\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"\u00d6ffnet in einem neuen Tab\"  data-cke-saved-href=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/allgemein-en\/how-germanys-weak-innovation-eco-system-is-driving-inequality\/\">Germany&#8217;s declining innovativeness contributes to inequality<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>3. Still An Important Market \u2013 Just Not AS Important<\/h2>\n<p>Different sets of countries dominate the sales markets for each of the key industries as Germany&#8217;s trade partners. For <strong>German chemicals<\/strong>, the G7 countries<\/p>\n<p><strong>France<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>United States <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>and Italy\u00a0<\/strong>are the main markets,<\/p>\n<p>followed by non-G7-countries such as the Netherlands or Austria.<br \/>\nFor <strong>machinery<\/strong>, <strong>China\u00a0<\/strong>is the most important buyer, importing nearly twice the amount the United States (ranked second) does. For the <strong>motor vehicle\u00a0<\/strong>industry, it is once again the <strong>United States\u00a0<\/strong>as\u00a0<strong>Germany&#8217;s trade partner <\/strong>buying the most German products, followed by <strong>China\u00a0<\/strong>and the two G7 countries <strong>United Kingdom and France.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/G7-3.png\" target=\"_blank\" aria-label=\"\u00d6ffnet in einem neuen Tab\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-20663\" src=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/G7-3.png\" alt=\"G7 - 3\" width=\"1298\" height=\"1298\" srcset=\"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/G7-3.png 1298w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/G7-3-300x300.png 300w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/G7-3-1024x1024.png 1024w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/G7-3-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/G7-3-768x768.png 768w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/G7-3-600x600.png 600w, https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/G7-3-400x400.png 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1298px) 100vw, 1298px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The picture is most dynamic for <strong>exports of German machinery\u00a0<\/strong>(parts), with the two leading buyers, China and USA, mainly importing final products (60-70%) and France (ranked 3rd) mostly buying intermediates (65%). Many other European countries also import intermediates to a large extent as Europe forms a rather integrated production area, with assembly processes (of German machinery and German machinery parts) scattered all over Europe.<\/p>\n<p>In 2014, <strong>26% of German exports\u00a0<\/strong>of machinery, 33% of chemicals and 37% for motor vehicle went to G7 countries. These exports included final products as well as intermediates to further production. Despite the recent decrease in their importance, the G7 countries <strong>are still important markets\u00a0<\/strong>for the German key industries. Nevertheless, the categorization into G7 and \u2018other countries\u2019 doesn\u2019t quite describe the main export markets anymore.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion &#8211; Are the G7 as Germany&#8217;s trade partners still as important?<\/h2>\n<p>The increased relevance of emerging markets, including the BRIC countries and Eastern Europe, has impacted the importance of the G7 in the supply chain and as a market for these three key German industries. <strong>The focus is now on the G20 rather than the G7.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><i>In this second of four blogposts we close the loop on Germany\u2019s relevant trading partners. Next week, we will look closer at how Germany benefits from the enlargement of the EU by forging close production networks with its neighbors to the east.<\/i><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Methodological Remark:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>All calculations are done by Systain Consulting GmbH and are based on data provided by the WIOD project (World Input-Output Database). WIOD provides international input-output tables for the period 2000-2014. 56 industry sectors across 43 countries and an additional \u2018rest of the world\u2019 region are covered.<\/p>\n<p>The calculations focus on three industries which are pillars of Germany\u2019s economic strength: \u2018chemicals\u2019, \u2018motor vehicles\u2019 and \u2018machinery and equipment\u2019. The analysis covers value added and hours worked within the respective supply chains.<br \/>\nwww.wiod.org<\/p>\n<p>Timmer, M. P., Dietzenbacher, E., Los, B., Stehrer, R. and de Vries, G. J. (2015), &#8222;An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input\u2013Output Database: the Case of Global Automotive Production&#8220;, Review of International Economics., 23: 575\u2013605<\/p>\n","excerpt":"<p>Today we are looking at Germany&#8217;s trade partners. In our mini-series on Global Value Chains (GVCs) we look at how three German key industries \u2013 motor vehicles, chemicals and machinery  &#8211; are part of complex international production networks. Economist sometimes call this the \u2018second wave of global unbundling\u2019.<\/p>\n","thumbnail":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/dmitrii-vaccinium-22833-unsplash-scaled.jpg","thumbnailsquare":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/24\/2018\/10\/dmitrii-vaccinium-22833-unsplash-scaled.jpg","authors":[{"id":6108,"name":"Christian Bluth","link":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/de\/blogger\/christian-bluth\/"}],"categories":[{"id":596,"name":"Economic Security &amp; Trade","link":"https:\/\/bst-europe.eu\/category\/economy-security-trade\/"}],"tags":[]}